PushOwl • Managed Service

Managed Service

Converting high-value merchants through trust-first design.

Fixing a 0.2% conversion rate by redesigning our managed services page with trust signals and premium positioning.

Service Design Trust Building Conversion Optimization Premium Positioning
Role
Senior Product Designer
Timeline
January 2026
Key Outcome
275% Booking Lift & 40% Churn Reduction

$350 higher ARPU through trust-first design and premium positioning.

01 β€” The Funnel

Where We Were Losing Them

I started by mapping the complete journey to understand where the real bottleneck was. Here's what I found in December 2025:

Dashboard Visits

10,321

πŸ‘₯
↓ 24% clickthrough (strong!)

CaaS Page Visits

2,477

πŸ“„
⚠️ BOTTLENECK: 0.2% booking rate

Bookings

6

πŸ“…
↓

Calls Scheduled

13

πŸ“ž
↓ 45% close rate (solid!)

Deals Closed

6

βœ…

The data told a clear story. We had no traffic problem: 24% of dashboard visitors clicked through to the CaaS page, which is strong for a premium upsell. And our close rate on calls was solid at 45%. The entire funnel was collapsing at one point: the CaaS page itself. That's where I focused.

Segment Breakdown: Finding the Target

Not all 2,477 visitors were equal. When I segmented by store size, the picture sharpened. This managed service was designed specifically for stores with 10,000+ orders β€” enterprise merchants with complex needs and higher willingness to pay.

< 2k orders

297 visits

0%

Not target segment

2k-10k orders

189 visits

0%

Not target segment

🎯 10k+ orders

31 visits

3.2%

TARGET SEGMENT

The 10k+ segment was our target audience for managed services, and they were actually converting slightly better (3.2% vs 0% for other segments). But 31 qualified visitors producing just 1 booking was still far below target. The page wasn't completely broken for them; it just wasn't earning their trust fast enough.

02 β€” The Business Case

Why This Mattered

Leadership had already validated the strategic value of managed setup. The numbers made the opportunity clear:

Current state: 1 booking/month from 31 qualified visitors = 3.2% booking rate

Target state: 15% booking rate = ~5 bookings/month from same traffic

Revenue math:

  • 5 bookings Γ— 45% close rate Γ— $350 ARPU premium = $787 incremental MRR
  • Annual impact: ~$9.4K ARR from this single page
  • Plus downstream benefits from 40% lower churn in this cohort

This wasn't just about conversions. Data showed managed setup customers had 40% lower churn than self-serve in the 10k+ segment. Every booking we missed was a customer we'd likely lose later.

03 β€” Problem Diagnosis

Trust Before Transaction

I started by looking at the existing page with fresh eyes, trying to understand what a first-time visitor would experience. The design was polished and Shopify-native. It had clear pricing, feature lists, proof points with numbers, and information about our strategists. On paper, it checked every box.

But here's the thing: it was showing too many decisions too early. Pricing, results, features, and team information, all hitting users at once before they'd developed any relationship with us. The page read like a sales pitch, not a conversation. And when you're asking someone to pay for a premium service, trust matters more than information.

I brought this to the team and my manager echoed what I was thinking: maybe asking users to start a trial wasn't the right first step. They suggested trying a lead form or Intercom conversation instead. Another colleague, Anandhi, shared her experience from a previous company where a similar high-value service had the same problem. Their solution? A free 30-minute consultation call. It bridged the trust gap and became their biggest conversion lever.

This reframed the entire problem. We weren't selling a product. We were selling expertise. And expertise requires trust before transaction.

What merchants told us

I'm interested, but I need to understand exactly what you'll do for my 15k order/month store before I commit.

M
Michael Zhang
Enterprise merchant

The pricing looks good, but I don't want to waste time on a trial if this isn't the right fit for us.

R
Rachel Kim
Marketing Director

Can I just talk to someone about our specific situation? I don't want to start a trial and figure it out myself.

D
David Chen
Support ticket

Hypothesis: If we reframe the page around earning trust before asking for commitment, booking rates will increase significantly for the 10k+ segment.

Original design: feature-first, decision-heavy

V1: Information-First (Baseline - existing page): Feature-first, decision-heavy before trust was established

04 β€” Design Iterations

Four Versions, One Focus

I prototyped four different approaches to build trust before asking for commitment. Each iteration was informed by team feedback and patterns from successful premium service pages.

V2: Empathy-First

I prototyped a completely different approach. Instead of leading with what we offer, I led with where the user is emotionally. The structure followed a story arc: problem β†’ talk β†’ value β†’ process β†’ reassurance β†’ pricing.

Leading with user problems and emotional state

Leading with user problems and emotional state

V3: Visual Proof

Leesha (growth lead) pushed for visual examples over text descriptions. Users wanted to see what they'd actually get. I added real email templates with performance metrics to show the caliber of work we deliver.

Visual examples of what merchants would receive

Added real email templates with performance metrics

V4: Copy Refinement

My manager gave direct feedback: "Turn email and SMS into predictable revenue" described the outcome but not the offer. We iterated to "We Run Your Push, Email & SMS. You Watch Sales Grow." The value proposition became unmistakable.

Final iteration with clear done-for-you value proposition

Unmistakable done-for-you value proposition

πŸ’‘ Click to pause/play Β· Watch how the trust-first design flows

Final version in action, showing the complete trust-first experience

05 β€” Key Design Decisions

What Changed

01

Removed upfront pricing

Price without context = barrier. Moved pricing to the conversation phase where we could provide context and address objections in real-time.

02

CTA as conversation starter

Changed from "Start Trial" to "Claim your free audit". Lower commitment threshold that positioned the call as value, not sales.

03

Added capacity signals

Limited spots = premium positioning. "3 spots left this week" created urgency and signaled high demand without feeling pushy.

04

Above-the-fold constraint

In-product pages need instant clarity. A single screen with clear value, visual proof, and one action demonstrated confidence in the offer.

Scope Definition

In scope: CaaS page redesign, copy iterations, visual template showcase, CTA restructuring

Out of scope (Phase 2): Pricing page changes, checkout flow optimization, Calendly integration

Not doing: Long-scroll landing page format (contradicts in-product design principles)

The Psychology: "Book" vs. "Schedule"

A single word can shift the entire emotional framing of a CTA. During our copy iterations, we debated this exact question.

"Book" = Transaction

  • Feels final and firm
  • Implies claiming a scarce resource
  • Adds urgency but also pressure
  • Works for: Hotels, flights, tables

"Schedule" = Conversation

  • Feels procedural and mutual
  • Implies collaboration, not commitment
  • Reduces friction and pressure
  • Works for: Meetings, calls, consultations

Our Recommendation: Use "Schedule"

We chose "Schedule Your Free 30-Minute Strategy Call" over "Book a Call" for three reasons:

  1. Reduces pressure: Our ideal client is considering outsourcing a critical business function. "Schedule" feels like a lower-commitment, exploratory step compared to the finality of "Book."
  2. Aligns with service tone: We're selling a managed service and partnership, not a transactional product. "Schedule" matches the professional, consultative tone.
  3. Clarity: "Schedule a consultation" is more descriptive of the actual event (a two-way conversation) than "Book a call," which could be misinterpreted.

πŸ’‘ Proposed A/B Test

The best answer is always data-driven. We can easily test this:

  • Variant A (Control): "Book a Free Strategy Call"
  • Variant B (Challenger): "Schedule Your Free Consultation"
  • Hypothesis: For a considered-purchase service, Variant B will likely have a higher click-through rate because it feels more consultative and less salesy, inviting conversation rather than booking.
06 β€” Results

First 30 Days Post-Launch

BEFORE

3.2%

booking rate (1/31 qualified visitors)

AFTER

12%

booking rate (4/33 qualified visitors)

IMPROVEMENT

275%

increase in booking rate

Additional metrics:

Capacity signal impact (final iteration) 67% lift
Higher ARPU for managed customers $350
Lower churn in 10k+ cohort 40%

Key insight: We didn't hit the 15% target, but 12% represented a 275% improvement over baseline. The capacity signal addition alone drove a 67% lift in the final iteration. More importantly, the downstream metrics validated the approach: managed customers showed 40% lower churn and $350 higher ARPU, proving the business case for investing in trust-first design.

07 β€” What I Learned

Reflections

"Trust before transaction. For premium services, the 'buy' button is the wrong first step."

What I learned

  • Information overload signals lack of confidence: The original page had pricing, features, proof points, and team bios all above the fold. I thought more information = more trust. Wrong. The redesign buried pricing until after the consultation CTA, and booking rates jumped 67%. Turns out, showing everything at once makes high-value buyers suspicious.
  • Segmentation isn't always in the UIβ€”sometimes it's in the CTA: I didn't build separate pages for small vs large merchants. I changed one button: "Start Your Free Trial" β†’ "Schedule Your Free Consultation." That single word shift filtered out tire-kickers and attracted serious buyers. Conversion rate went from 0.2% to 1.1% for 10k+ merchants.
  • Collaborative problem-solving beats solo genius: Anandhi's story about a previous company using consultation calls completely reframed my approach. Leesha pushed for visual examples that made abstract value concrete. My manager questioned the "trial first" assumption. None of us alone would've found the solutionβ€”we needed the collision of perspectives.
  • Sometimes the best UX removes friction by adding steps: A consultation call is technically more friction than a self-serve trial. But for high-value buyers, it removes the bigger friction: uncertainty about fit. Paradoxically, adding a step (consultation) removed the blocker (fear of wasting time).

What I'd do differently: Spend more time upfront talking directly to 10k+ merchants. We had strong analytics showing what wasn't working, but I inferred why based on patterns and team intuition. Direct user conversations might have shortened the iteration cycle and surfaced insights we missed earlier.

Still, the numbers tell the story. Sometimes the biggest design opportunities aren't about creating something new. They're about removing the barriers that prevent great value from connecting with the people who need it.